🔗 Share this article

Are your professional networking followers viewing you as a industry expert? Do numerous respondents praising your advice on expanding your business? Are headhunters reaching out to explore opportunities?

Should that not be the case, the explanation might be that you're not male.

The Test: Modifying Profile Gender for Increased Reach

Dozens of women joined an organized professional network test recently following popular discussions indicated that switching their profile gender to "man" boosted their platform visibility.

Some participants modified their professional summaries to include what they termed "masculine-oriented" language - adding action-focused business buzzwords like "drive", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their visibility also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Raised

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether a built-in gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes male users who employ online business jargon.

Like many large networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to determine which content appear to which members - boosting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

Through a blog post, LinkedIn recognized the phenomenon but stated it does not consider "personal characteristics" when determining content distribution. Instead, the company explained that "numerous factors" affect how posts perform.

Changing gender on your profile does not affect how your posts appears in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who modified her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her profile name to "a masculine version", described extraordinary outcomes.

"The numbers I'm seeing show a 1,600% increase in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, started testing after observing her reach decrease substantially.

The Method

• First, she changed her profile gender to "male"
• Then, she used AI tools to rewrite her profile using "masculine-oriented" language
• Lastly, she recycled old posts with comparable "agentic" style

The outcome was instantaneous: a 415% increase in visibility within one week.

The Downside

Despite the positive results, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the approach.

"Previously, my posts were more personal - brief and insightful, but also friendly and relatable," she explained. "Now, the masculine version was forceful and self-assured - similar to a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She abandoned the experiment after seven days, stating "Each day I continued, and results got better, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Not all participants encountered positive outcomes. Cass Cooper who modified both her profile gender to "man" and her race to "Caucasian" reported a reduction in reach and engagement.

"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it operates in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These tests coincide with ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a professional network and community site.

Platform modifications in the past few months have apparently resulted in female creators experiencing significantly reduced visibility, leading to informal experiments where identical content by male and female users received vastly different reach.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to classify and spread posts based on multiple factors, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its systems, including "examinations of inequalities based on gender."

Company representative suggested that recent declines in certain members' visibility might originate from increased competition due to more content on the network.

Changing Landscape

As one participant observed, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she commented. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly competitive and less controlled."